Daily prompt: Oh for goodness sake!


In the city of Melbourne, one of Australia’s state capitals, ten pedestrian crossing lights will be replaced at a cost of 8,400 AUD so that instead of little green or red men saying ‘cross’ or ‘don’t cross’, it will be little green or red women (in skirts).

Oh for goodness sake! How petty can we get?

Of course I want gender equality. But why am I supposed to give a flying fiddle-de-dee which gender tells me when it’s safe to cross the road as long as they get it right? Apparently it will make me feel good. That, I hate to tell them, is likely to depend on issues far greater than the gender of crossing lights. And if female ones will make a positive difference to my outlook, will they have a negative impact on men? And if not, why not? Personally, I’ve always regarded the figures on pedestrian lights as sexless stick figure, but maybe that’s because I never wear skirts.

It’s a bit like the furore over the word mankind. I like mankind. It has a ring to it – a rhythm. And a history. And it had never occurred to me that it was discriminatory. As far as I am concerned, it isn’t. It’s a two-syllable word referring to the whole human race, male, female, LGBTIQA or whatever – man as opposed to dog, monkey, elephant, amoeba etc, not man as opposed to woman (or LGBTIQA). And humankind? As well as being a clumsy word (or perhaps because of being a clumsy word) it shoves the human part down my gullet, and humans at the moment are being pretty damn stupid, whereas mankind is an entity in itself whose meaning we all accepted until gender fanatics got their knickers in a twist about it.

 So it’s all a matter of nuance, isn’t it. Which shade of meaning you choose to see. And it is my absolute belief that if we continue to rake up every possible discriminatory nuance we can find and make a song and dance about it, we are trivialising a movement that has far more important issues to deal with, and should be keeping its focus on things that matter – like equal rights, equal opportunity, equal protection, equal pay – instead of poncing around about the gender of traffic lights.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Daily prompt: Oh for goodness sake!

  1. wscottling says:

    I utterly and completely agree with you about this.

  2. rugby843 says:

    You need to get a seat on the council. That is ridiculous.

    • I’d be hopeless on a council. Probably run amok with a machete. Fortunately Melbourne is about 1300 km away and where I live is too small to have traffic lights, but the general feeling in Melbourne seems to be a list of ways the money could have been better spent to help women who really need it.

  3. Pingback: Why be a rabbit? Be a snake. | Trash of Pi

  4. Aunt Beulah says:

    Amen and amen and Amen and Glory Hallelujah!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s